


EBC 13-15 Porsche 911 (991) (Cast Iron Rotor only) 3.8 GT3 Yellowstuff Rear Brake Pads
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
EBC 13-15 Porsche 911 (991) (Cast Iron Rotor only) 3.8 GT3 Yellowstuff Rear Brake PadsEBC Yellowstuff is an aramid fibre based brake compound with high brake effect form cold and is possibly one of the first ever compounds that can be used for STREET AND TRACK DRIVING. These pads do not require warm up but do get even stronger under the heat of hard driving. These are not a low dust pad and if your desire is for a low dust premium street use pad, you should consider EBC Redstuff. When considering full race use, Yellowstuff has been a
Quick Dispatch:
Your EBC 13-15 Porsche 911 (991) (Cast Iron Rotor only) 3.8 GT3 Yellowstuff Rear Brake Pads orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your EBC 13-15 Porsche 911 (991) (Cast Iron Rotor only) 3.8 GT3 Yellowstuff Rear Brake Pads ships.
Need Help?
Questions about EBC 13-15 Porsche 911 (991) (Cast Iron Rotor only) 3.8 GT3 Yellowstuff Rear Brake Pads, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for EBC 13-15 Porsche 911 (991) (Cast Iron Rotor only) 3.8 GT3 Yellowstuff Rear Brake Pads in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 2137 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
strong magnet
Style: 15W Charger
This procuts magnet is really strong. would hold a tablet but I don't recommend that. works just fine with my samsung Tab phone that is larger than most iphones.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Cheap, easily breakable, and barley works
Style: 15W Charger, Style: 15W Charger
First off, it didn’t even come with the charging chord, so I had to order another separately after it came. The product broke the fourth time i used it, the whole thing came apart when i tried taking my phone off. When it was working, it charged maybe 1% every hour. Definitely not the best choice in the category, look at other options
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Super stable, strong magnet, fast, charging Tesla screen mount
Style: 15W Charger
This is a great item. It’s adjustable annd attaches firmly and no tape no adhesive. I’ve been using it for several weeks now charges the phone very fast.. The phone has never fallen off of it. Not even close. Highly recommend this item.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Works great, but included cable is too short
Style: 15W Charger
The cable included is only about 3 feet long and has a USB-a plug. Teslas now have only USB-c outlets, so the cable is useless anyway. If the cable were 6’ long and type USB-c, it could be tucked under the molding and hidden. I had to get another cable to complete the installation. I like this mount/charger because it is nondestructive - it doesn’t use tape or glue to install. The magnet is strong and it charges my phone quickly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2024
★★★★★ 3
Decent but magnet isn’t strong enough
Style: 15W Charger
Unit appears well made and I feel like it minimizes any potential damage to the screen. For me, magnet just wasn’t strong enough and I wasn’t a fan of the cable - would be nice if product had clips for cable management or something to give it a cleaner install. If it wasn’t for the magnet issue, I probably would have kept. Returned.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2026