Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109

Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109

Marsoni

M251S

$31.25

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109WSM Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988 2002 Piston Ring Set 1. 5mm OVER SIZE ONLY OEM #: 13008 1090 Make Model CC HP Year Kawasaki Bayou 220 1988 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1989 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1990 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1991 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1992 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1993 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1994 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1995 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1996 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1997 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1998 Kawasaki Bayou 220 1999 Kawasaki Bayou 220 2000 Kawasaki Bayou 220 2001 Kawasaki

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Kawasaki 220 Bayou 1988-2002 Piston Ring Set 51-250-09 - 1.5mm SIZE OE 13008-109 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I absolutely love this 4-panel room divider! It was super easy to assemble — I had it set up in just a few minutes. The material isn’t too see-through, which gives just the right amount of privacy while still letting some light through. It does exactly what I needed it to do and looks so clean and sleek in my space. Perfect balance of style and function — highly recommend!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2025

Verified Purchase

Virginia C.

Bozeman, US

★★★★★ 5

A quick private space

Color: Black, Size: Standard - 4 Panel

Went together easily, just the right height and width for just a bit of privacy.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2026

Verified Purchase

Pat Smith

Charlottesville, US

★★★★★ 5

Excellent quality, excellent privacy.

Color: White, Size: 4 Panel

I love this room divider! Was easy to put together. It's easy to move around. I also bought the eight panel. I move it and change it around all the time. Good color good material good privacy.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2026

Verified Purchase

Skylar Hartnett

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 5

It works to divide a room, but it's not easy to use.

Color: Grey, Size: 6 Panel

This comes in multiple pieces and you have to build every single piece including the cloth that is between the two poles. There are plastic clips to hold the sections together, but they easily come off if you move the dividers the wrong way or try to reposition it. The only thing holding it up is rectangular shaped feet on the bottom and they are a pain when you hit it with your toes. It works if you need to divide a room, but its not pretty and there are far better options. It's cheaply made and has a habit of falling down if you are trying to use it in a straight or slightly angled line.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on December 26, 2022

Verified Purchase

Amazon Customer swengelp

Lexington, US

★★★★★ 4

Nice divider

Color: Black, Size: 6 Panel

Nice divider. Set up is a bear. I am a bit concerned with stability. Overall I like it.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2026